Hi.
If I export to Illustrator, hatches end up on a big pile in the center of the artboard, if they were scaled in Rhino, they are not in the exported doc.
I find it quicker to do the hatching in Rhino, this way i dont have to go back if curves are open, intersecting, or there are cut outs.
Would be great if you could help me to find a solution.
Hi Anika - you can BlockEdit, Copy the hatches to the clipboard, exit BlockEdit and then paste to get āfreeā hatches. Does that do anything useful?
super cool. thanks! makes it a lot more usable for architectural work.
Best thing would be: export a layout as ai, with the layout matching the illustrator artboard.
Let me add my opinion about this. I hugely use illustrator.
A cool thing could be an option to detach (not explode) a block and all its nested blocks if any from the original block.
With illustrator, you donāt have āblocksā, you have symbols (very similar)ā¦and, for every symbol instance itās possible to detach it from the symbol, if the symbol was scaled, itās unlinked āas isā. At this point , depending on the illustrator version, the symbol instance becomes a group or a layer and is no longer linked to any symbol.
I use this feature every day.
In rhino, a quick way to turn a block instance into a group, keeping all styles (hatch, line styles) is missing.
It is possible the way Pascal told us, but itās really time consuming.
@pascal yeah. layer structure is lost thoughā¦
id prefer something like autocads export ālayout as dwgā since in professional use, you often dont want to hand over a full model, but still organized within layers for further edit.
@piem blocks to symbols! like that too! lets form a rhino-illlustrator appreciation society.
āto detach (not explode) a block and all its nested blocks if any from the original block.ā i dont understand that thoughā¦
i guess its already there. With _explodeblocks - not _explode, there is a suboption to group the output. would be great to auto name the groups after the former blocks though.
Hi Anika - the problem there is that you might explode multiple instances of the same block - you would not want all to be in a single groupā¦ would you?
ok. but on what basis rhino can predict to which degree nested blocks should become nested symbols, or notā¦? thats the role of the user right? / i dont use symbols that oftenā¦ maybe I need to catch up on that issue. @piem could you do me a favor and also follow up on the https://mcneel.myjetbrains.com/youtrack/issue/RH-49623
for the export proper hatches issue? I just signed up.
ah ok. than maybe a string name with common denominator indicator ā123-ā and for instances separated suffixes ā-0001ā ā-00002ā
Or some object attribute: these can be identical right?
@anika.boeller, @piem - Here is a quick and dirty cut at this - it makes a new group with an incremented version of the block name. Nested blocks are not making nested groups, I do not know how practical that is to implement. Currently the block instance is also left in place, but it is easy enough to provide an optionā¦
quick it isā¦ yay! works fine. im truly overwhelmed by the feedback frequency here in this forum!!! @piem what are your thoughts with this blocks-to-symbols case.