Wish: different name for grasshopper groups

If Grasshopper groups (“containers”) had inputs to control its content

and see video here at 2:35 How to manage a big definition? Any tips?
… that would mean going near to what clusters currently are.

Maybe we could end up with a single object type, the “cluster”, that can be in “packed state” (like current cluster) or “upacked state” (like current groups/containers).

Surely you have a better view of the situation…

1 Like