Yes, this is definitely better than the original one.
I am sure you won’t present such a design to your customers. You are a professional designer 
@encephalon , I would ask the money back if this were a paid job. It only shows Rhino + xNURBS creates a better model. 
We posted a message to another thread and asked Rhino to publicly reveal the guys’ names who vote xNURBS on Food4Rhino. The following is a part of the message:
Currently, xNURBS rating on Food4Rhino is 2.8 - genuine xNURBS users give 5-star rating on Food4Rhino and trolls use fake IDs or anonymously give 1-star rating. In other words, nearly half of rating are 1-stars and another half are 5-stars on Food4Rhino. For anyone with basic statistics knowledge, it means the rating on Food4Rhino is forged. In plain language, trolls are manipulating xNURBS rating on Food4Rhino… We have 18 votes in total on Food4Rhino. Those guy(s) didn’t realize that, with their “work”, we only have 1-star or 5-star rating on Food4Rhino, which makes it “awkward”.
The xNURBS development benefits the whole Rhino community and Rhino users. From the simple fact that nearly half of rating are 1-stars and another half are 5-stars on Food4Rhino, it is obvious that trolls are attacking us. Apparently, someone try to discourage us from further developing xNURBS for Rhino users. Without xNURBS, professional designers would use other software (or Rhino competitors) to design a production automotive model, e.g., the model below. Some person(s) are upset with the fact that, with xNURBS, talented industrial designers can use Rhino to deliver super impressive automotive models in a very short period of time. In my opinion, the trolls may actually work for Rhino’s competitors and it is Rhino’s job (not ours) to deal with them. Bob, could you ask Carlos to publicly reveal the guys’ names who rate xNURBS on Food4Rhino? I don’t see any reason why someone needs to use fake IDs or anonymously make 1-star rating.
The automotive model is designed using xNURBS in Rhino 7.
