Rhino 9 WIP (9.0.26139) - UI

,

So you can’t be serious about such a visual, right?

V9

V8/V9 (previous build)

It’s half the screen thick! It looks terrible.
and it makes me sick in fullscreen. I’m going to vomit through my eyes.

Uff. / Peter

Hi Peter -

We have turned on the Liquid Glass feature of macOS Tahoe that Apple in the not too distant future will make mandatory. I don’t know if there is a way around that - I noticed that the Apple Safari top bar is even higher than in the Rhino WIP - but I’ve put this on the list for a closer look.
RH-95724 UI: Liquid Glass: Top Bar
-wim

As I understand it, if you work on a MacBook, it’s probably okay because you have a notch in the middle. But how many professionals work on a laptop when they’re not at a client’s or giving a presentation?

on safari (which also looks terrible) it makes sense if you have tabs turned on in compact mode. But in rhino it’s a long white/black thick area that takes up a lot of space and looks terrible. Sry

fwiw, nobody here is very much impressed with Liquid Glass, but it’s not going to be an option…

ah im never upgrading from sequoia (it hasnt changed here)

btw the notch is actually in the menu bar which is already 1000px in height, so it’d be below/in addition to that

As you can read in the YT, this is not something that we can change.
-wim

What is the difference between this and this window in terms of the liquid glass conditions?


why can the render window have a thin bar. because it is already a window that is called by the main program that fulfills it? And if I put the render windows on full screen, what difference does it make? :slight_smile:

that humongous bar is quite a statement. since the bar at least vanishes in v8 when you set it to full screen, why not at least have this function either? now there is just a huge blunt bar that serves no purpose but takes 1/32 of the screen real estate.

please not. at least give us an advanced option to reduce it to something less obtrusive? better, why not skip that title bar fully?