Hello again, I’m working on a geodesic dome (which will actually be built) and I think it’s better for a cleaner assembly. Can you help me, how did I achieve this?
ERN_LuSilva_DomoGeodesico_Help.gh (54.0 KB)
Option1: Remove the bars with the yellow “x” (image)
Option2: Keep the bars with the yellow “x” (for improve the tough)
It would be great if you first clean your file so it only contains the necessary part .
Yes, sorry. here it is.
Also, I noticed I have an issue with the “cutting plane” in the script; whenever I change the factor (height), the geometry doesn’t follow correctly. Can you review this as well?
I think you meant keep the bars with “red” mark in your image .
For the cutting plane, please add more info because I can’t find any plane intersections in your file
Thank you!!! I’m continuing to work on this script. When I make these changes and other improvements, I’ll post them here.
But I would choose an even number of subdivisioning so that the icosahedron can be trimmed into a hemisphere.
Oh, yes, in terms of constructability, it’s much better to have the foundation perpendicular to the plane. I’m working on it. I found this solution:
I’ll try what you did; there’s always something to learn.
Right now, there’s one part of the script I’d like to improve because it’s not parameterized; it’s more of a guess, based on trial and error.
Here:
My currently script:
ERN_LuSilva_DomoGeodesico_REV03.gh (61.0 KB)
ERN_LuSilva_DomoGeodesico_REV04.gh (58.0 KB)
Thanks for help me 
