This one ig grouping by type but baking makes them individual:
How can I get Elefront’s: Group object in Same Branch.?
Another question about baking:
Why the upper needs the name and the lower one doesn’t? It is the same component.
Look here:
What if you wanted to select baked object within one cell?
Nice stuff btw.
This one above is like 300 meshes in a block and then 7 to 14 instances of a block. So I could select the block, double click and edit if necessary.
Hi Piotr -
Alternatively, you can name objects or create key-value pairs that can be used to select objects in the Rhino document.
-wim
Sure thig, but I am preparing the script for the team that isn’t so familiar with all tricks.
They are used to: bake this, bake that to get final result without need for editing.
I am on the crossroads and my choices are:
A. stay with V7
B. use V8 with plugins
C. use V8 exclusively and suffer
I want to move my team forward but I can’t risk it will slow down, stop or make errors at the production.
I will run some speed test V7 vs V8, maybe the performance could be the prevailing factor.
you might group after baking i think by using the GUID of the objects from the content cashe output , with c# component you can iterate through each branch in the data tree , create a group for each branch and add those ids in the group
Agree, this is very inconvenient, native baking should work with groups as it does with other plug-ins.
i think content cashe still surpasses any other plugin out there as it understands Model objects created in grasshopper with their attributes , the tricky part is when you want to modify the objects afterwards using their IDs and it starts looping for some reason
Honestly I have had no need to make use of those features at all. Most of the time I just need to bake static things. Update def, delete objects and rebake.