Thank you for your suggestions, we will consider what is the best way to make the backend more powerful. Explanation of your use cases lets us understand details of your workflow much better.
Don’t worry, ShapeDiver is moving forward. We have been quietly working on major upgrades some of which has been already rolled out and lot more is coming soon including new platform with improved UX, better Grasshopper plugin, desktop clients, faster geometry backend…
Your model shouldn’t run so much slower on ShapeDiver and there is number of reasons why it doesn’t perform as you would expect. Try to narrow down the issue and post a minimal version of your definition. Our video tutorials can give you ideas on what to improve as well. We helped lot of our clients with their models and our sales team can give you more details regarding the private support if you are interested, let them know via the contact form at www.shapediver.com.