“What is BETA? We’re not adding any new features, nor are we making significant changes to the UI. We’re also done breaking the APIs, so plug-ins written for this Beta will work in the commercial release of Rhino 8.”
Really?
Some thoughts on the Mac version 8 interface:
The bottom edge of any display window is for me at least the most unnoticed or paid attention to when I’m working. In the latest WIP I note the buttons for ortho, history, etc. have been moved to a rather thin ribbon at the very bottom of the display. I suppose this was done to reduce the visual clutter from the top/header of the window?
It may be more aesthetically pleasing but it’s less than useful in this layout.
In V7 I’ve also the OSnap and Filters buttons up top which are quite handy. Those are gone and what’s always struck me as a wasted space in the left panel neath the main tool bar panel that’s nearly empty but for the list of OSnaps check boxes.
Also in V7, I can stack/have open more than a single sub panel but now it seems I’ve to make extra clicks to bring up what’s needed. Why can’t one have either option?
I don’t bother with the view buttons - also relocated to the tiny bottom ribbon but still, the placement is not convenient. I use key combos to bring up the desired views but I can’t find that functionality. Is it even available at this point. Again, why make this an obstacle?
Another issue is the command history - currently the panel option doesn’t display the last commands run. If I’ve to check I have to scroll down each time I want to see what’s happened. Can’t the panel automatically update to the use has an immediate indication? Good design reduces the amount of user effort (clicks) to achieve tasks. This latest interface actually increases them. Over an 8 hour day those extra clicks add up!
I appreciate the aesthetic of a Mac interface and a clean presentation (I note the ‘grayed out’ quality of the top tool bar ribbon tabs) but I’m also inclined to efficient design. So far, things look nice but are actually less useful.
One visual improvement I’d offer is the option to increase the space tween tool icons in the tool panels.
Are the interface designers also actual professional users of the application. I often encounter applications that seem to have been laid out by decorators rather than designers.