Soft-edit surface snaps to control point?

[eobet]

@norbert_geelen @Gijs I have an entire separate thread for that here:

Please add "DistanceType" to "Soft Edit Surface"

Soft edit surface currently has a U distance and a V distance parameter, which both apparently are in the document’s units. This is bad if you are attempt to soft edit a surface that has a G1/G2/G3 continuity applied to it, because you might accidentally move and ruin that. A better solution would be to rather than choosing a distance in units, instead choose a distance in number of control points. Like, a U distance of 2, would be 2 control points on the hull, regardless of how far apart the…

This thread is only about the fact that despite using world units, there is an initial “snap to control point”, which to me seems to run counter to using world units in the existing SoftEditSrf command.

I’m not sure if I’m hitting a language barrier with Mr. John Brock again (English is not my native tongue), but perhaps @Pascal or @wim can chime in and see if they understand what I’m trying to say?