RhinoBrepClosestPoint issue in SR10

[dale (Dale Fugier)]

Continuing the discussion from RhinoSplitBrepFace problem after latest updates:

@Filip

RhinoBrepClosestPoint

I’ve moved this to a new topic, since it is really a new topic…

[dale (Dale Fugier)]

This is the same bug as the RhinoSplitBrepFace bugs reported here.

RhinoSplitBrepFace problem after latest updates

Hi dale, Thank you for responding. I’m running Version 5 SR10 64-bit and before update SR9. This is the problem, I have a model (Brep) and when I want to import in Rhino debug mode, Rhino informs me that the model have invalid face, some trims and loops and then crash it. But when I import it in release mode nothing happens and when I used “What” command the model seams valid??(Beside this, model have some bad objects when you use SelBadObjects) So, with SR9 I used this model in RhinoSplitBre…

Bug in ON_Brep::SplitClosedFaces() for Rhino 5 SR10?

Dear Rhino specialists, We are using Rhino as preprocessor for our structural analysis package. Before transferring the geometry to the mesher, we perform a number of geometry operations like splitting bipolar and closed surfaces in a C++ plugin within Rhino. However, since the latest service release of Rhino 5, SR 10 we observe problems with the function ON_Brep::SplitClosedFaces() from the openNURBS toolkit. Attached you will find a test command together with an example. Calling SplitClosedF…

This will be fixed in the next SR.

Just curious, how are you creating these surfaces? I’m pretty sure Rhino (commands) won’t let you create transposed rev surfaces…

[Filip]

Hi dale,
I’m not creating those surfaces and I don’t know in which program are created, we receive from the client. But when Rhino said Is Valid then we don’t care about breps
So, when to expect the new SR?

Regards, Filip

[dale (Dale Fugier)]

@Filip

So, when to expect the new SR?

I don’t know when to expect a new SR. But when a release candidate is made available, you will here it here on Discourse.

[andreasniggl]

Hi Dale,
It was one of my test examples I created in Rhino 4. However, it could be, that we flipped the surface normal manually using command ‘_Dir’ as we often change the normal (as well as the u,v-parameters) to control the orientation of the finite elements we generate on the surfaces.

Andreas