FillSrf got annonced as g2 continuos patch here This topic is about some Wishes / Features i would love to see. I also opend a topic about challenges - where the command can prove its functionality. @Gijs @menno - i will separate each wish in a post below, feel free to move them to separate topic,…

above / below / limit Surface for the Watchmakertool-Challenge it would be great to not “invent” the blue inner curve, but to provide some “above” surface. … a below surface will be the opposite of course. Selection should show Normal direction. Maybe the algorithm is clever enough to decide wether …

Symmetry from a Users point of view it would be really great, if we can trust the command to produce symmetrical results within tolerance - even if the u-v-/isocurve-distribution does not look like. of course this is an extreme example. a setback fillet would be simpler… [image] hex-Corner_00.3…

Curve on Surface for some transitions it is quite hard to find a nice trimming. where should the surface be trimmed to allow a nice transition - rhino does not offer simple tools for this question. their are some very limited workflows with matchSrf and history. fillSrf should allow Curve on Surf…

smart trimming [Screenshot 2025-02-16 at 14.58.50] if edges form a region, it would be great to have an optional trim. to get the fill - without splitting the edges. fillSrf_trim.3dm (2.9 MB)

subD toNurbs Starpoint-Repair see this topic it would be nice to have an Option in the _ToNurbs command, that will use the logic of _fillSrf to repair starpoints

@Tom_P thank you for trying out the new command and for your useful feature requests. I have logged them as follows: Above/below surface support RH-86062 Support Symmetry RH-86063 Curve on surface RH-86065 Smart Trimming RH-86008 SubD ToNurbs star repair RH-86064

many thanks for looking / investigating on it. smart trim, apprentLoops i do not like the option name ApparentLoops you suggest on youtrack. I am not a native speaker. I think the term loops - even if it is technical correct regarding the Brep structure - is not used anywhere in the UI. Similar…

I’m certainly open for alternatives, changing a command option name is trivial in the WIP stage. With that in mind I’d go for ClosedRegions=Yes/No or indeed Extend=Yes/No I used plural intentionally - with the question in the YT what to do in that case. Fitting one surface to all closed regions, o…

[image] Menno Deij - van Rijswijk: Fitting one surface i would stay with the premise one surface per command call - as nearly all surface commands work like this. the (advanced) user still would have the option of pulling curves and trimming complex holes or multiple patches in a second step…

Got it. If you have a reliable crash (“poof, rhino is gone”) let me know with steps to reproduce. That needs to be looked at and fixed. I know Rhino can also sometimes hang with the need to force-quit, because the surface density just gets out of hand while refining where edges do not meet the cons…

FillSrf - Wishes / Features

Serengeti (Rhino WIP)

brian (Brian Gillespie) April 1, 2025, 11:23pm 14

RH-86008 is fixed in Rhino WIP

Topic		Replies	Views
Rhino WIP Feature: Patch re-implemented Serengeti (Rhino WIP) patch	562	33087	May 12, 2026
FillSrf - Challenges - support the development Serengeti (Rhino WIP)	12	737	February 18, 2025
Rhino 7 wip trim Serengeti (Rhino WIP)	16	1946	October 4, 2020
FillSrf, I love you! Serengeti (Rhino WIP) windows	11	832	May 6, 2025
Patch command - symmetry option Serengeti (Rhino WIP) windows	2	122	October 13, 2025

FillSrf - Wishes / Features

Related topics