Great, it sounds great. Looking forward to your masterpiece
Hello Peter, my 30 Day Trial will expire very soon- i would love to contiue testing cyberstrak,
can you reset the trial or maybe enlengthen it to 90 day trial?
Hi @Jjcg23:
I recommend you contact me via the form on the web (https://www.cyberstrak.com/en#contact) to discuss further.
Hi @Alen_Russ,
today version 1.3 was uploaded, Start/End partial is in Matching now available!
5 Likes
Hi @Jordi,
today version 1.3 was uploaded - it is now possible in Surface Blend to get Result surface from iso shrinked input surfaces!
11 Likes
8 Likes
wow how did I miss this thread?? amazing work so far Peter! looking forward to downloading and checking this out, not sure if this has been mentioned but I did mention in the old vsr thread- is there an option for symmetry modeling similar to alias?
1 Like
Nice job, thanks man
Just posting the downloading link for convenience. The new version has some nice additions!
https://www.cyberstrak.com/en/downloads
Hi Peter, there are some nice additions to V1.3, thanks.
I noticed that you added a blend curve as well. Will you support numerical input for the blend curve at some point? For the work that I do I end up with long strings of sharp edges that need to be trimmed back and blended, numerical input would really help to keep the blend ratio the same between sections.
3 Likes
Hi @Mark,
OK, I have to check.
1 Like
Hi Peter, thank you so much for that. Gute Arbeit!
Sounds good Peter. I think the seatstays in a bike frame are a good example for me. They are often not quite symmetrical and the blends are often tapered. My work-around right now is to create one blend that I like and copy the blend curve to other positions and scale and match to keep the blend ratio similar. Having numerical input could speed up that process quite a lot.
1 Like
Numerical input is an absolut must.
There should be no discussion about this, imho.
1 Like
I think I’ve asked for a numerical input for BlendCrv more than 10 years ago here in the discourse.
I’ll love to have it.
2 Likes
Yes, I can’t wrap my head around why McNeel cannot include this simple feature in the blendcrv dialogue, especially since blendsrf DOES include it.
@Peter_Salzman Just for the sake of completeness: the request for numeric input is equally important for “surface blend”.
6 Likes
Is there a introduction to the usage of cyberstrak yet?
somebody mentioned youtube videos…
i havent found anything so far.
2 Likes
Hi @Jjcg 23,
sorry there is no such material yet. Hope to create some in during the next weeks.
3 Likes
Hi @norbert_geelen,
OK, understood. Checked how it was presented in VSR - if I recall correctly 1st factor was for CV length taken related to ref curve/surface, second ratio factor for 3rd Row (curvature) related to tangent. Or do I miss something?
4 Likes
Yes, exactly.