(WIP-V9-Feature) SetBackFillets

Rhino WIP / V9 has setback Fillets.
nice.

any chance we get an option to edit the size / Amount of the Setback ?

FilletEdge fails if edges are to short for the default Setback size.

would be great to have a separate command “setbackCorner” as well - to allow Workflows that use _filletSrf.
hopefully this will be exposed to Rhinocommon.

@menno you are working on this ? (if not maybe adress the topic to the right person)

nice to see some improvements in the field of fillets

looking forward to see the next improvements. kind regards - tom

4 Likes

I used setback blends in Rhino 7 a few years ago. It was a hidden test command.
! _Testsetbackblendedge


There was a script for Rhino 4, as well. Back in 2012.
setbackfillet.zip (1.7 KB)
Обяснение


“Fillet surface corner” is another useful script that lets you fillet a surface edge without the need to use a trimming curve or surface.
FIlletSrfCorner.py (9.0 KB)

2 Likes

I thought v8 already has this or is this something else?

Never mind my question it was blend edge that has setback fillets I confused it srry

can we get an distinction between concave and convex fillets?
just found
this fusion 360 video- starting min 6:10
he explains the “ruled” fillet, wich seems to give that kind of control(rounds/fillets)

How about a cordal option? rollingball looks ugly in most of the cases…basically every time you try to fillet anything else then a box :wink:

like every time a angle changes in an edge-

You are looking for the “NormalToFace” and “TangentToFace” Command line options in Rhino 10:

Fillet - Normal to face and Tangent to edge.3dm (1.9 MB)

can we get an distinction between concave and convex fillets?
just found
this fusion 360 video- starting min 6:10
he explains the “ruled” fillet, wich seems to give that kind of control(rounds/fillets)

i think it is not exactly the same- but still interesting-

how does that work?

In fact, what I described above and showed in the picture, is much better and quicker approach than the one used in Fusion 360. There is no need to separate those surfaces prior running the fillet operation, because the “NormalToFace” option (an imaginary option that hopefully will be implemented in future Rhino) selects all edges whose end is adjacent to the selected surface (the yellow top surface). No need to be perfectly normal to the surface. Those edges could be inclined, too. Unless they are tangent to the surface (along the surface).

It’s been there since v5!

It’s named RailType:DistBetweenRails have a look at the help: FilletEdge | Rhino 3-D modeling
I’ve to be fair and it works only if there’s enough space but I used it all the time.

it exist from v7: is FaceEdges in the selection option

I know (it’s how I created my bottom example), but I gave those two names for future Rhino Command line options to give them a better distinction when comparing both types in the attached image. :smiley:

1 Like