@pascal is this a settings issue or a regression bug? Rh5 doesnt have this issue but some settings dont migrate 1:1
Orienting “horizontal to view” is not desired as the text needs to be oriented either vertically or horizontally depending on how the text best fits on the surface it is grouped with.
I understand, the annotations were completely revamped, but can they be “finalized” a bit better?
I don’t care about random 180 flip when text is vertical, but some texts get mirrored for no reason.
Please.
Also as a side note, the setting that controls that is not separate for dims and texts, so it can’t be turned off for texts and on for dims what we essentially had in R5.
Is there any thought to separating this setting from the dimensions so that text annotations can function separately than dimension text? Having the setting duplicated essentially, one for dimensions others for text annotations.
@Mason - Since text is now subject to annotation style controls, you can do that now with one style for dimensions and another for text.
There’s no plan that I know about to add another control value
Why is dimension text orientation using different algorithm than text? So, your workaround is to duplicate the annotation style amount? Then tell me how do I explain to our drafters that they’ll have to scroll through double of this:
@brian can this be logged as a regression issue? We can’t make it work with orient to view checkbox marked, 'cause text gets wonky and we can’t make it work with that checkbox unchecked, 'cause dimensions will become unreadable. All we’re asking is to make text orientation behave like dimension text. We don’t need any separate options. We just want text and dimensions to look uniform. Thank you…