See the attached GH file. Revolution-UntrimmedSurf.gh (17.0 KB)
When I revolve a closed curve, the resulting geometry is an “untrimmed surface,” but not the expected “closed brep,” as demonstrated by the capped extrusion.
I would think that “Closed Brep” would be the priority definition of a geometry, as it’s better to know whether you’re working with a brep or a surface. Is there something about this revolution geometry that is making it fail the “closed brep” definition, or does it fit the definition but its “untrimmed surface” label takes higher priority?
Baking creates a solid with no naked/non-manifold edges.
Hi @jasongberger, @Michael_Pryor - both surfaces and polysurfaces, eiher trimmed or untrimmed, are added to the Rhino document as Breps. Your real question might be whether or not the Brep contains a single surface or multiple surfaces.
Yeap understood, I believe what he is talking about is what a GH panel outputs as the geometry description. In his case it output a description as “untrimmed surface”. GH outputs a description of Brep if it is not a single surface geometry (trimmed or untrimmed).