I noticed, when splitting a tree using (split tree command) the output is not automatic in the same order as the mask.
Example;
mask (A) item {0:0;1} belong to 0,0,6.3
mask (B) item {0:0;0} belong to 0,0,0
but when mask (A) and (B) are combined in 1 mask list, the output is not in order of (A) & (B) but (B) & (A) instead. (has probably to do because item B is higher up in the Data tree).
I know I could switch the input data list, however I need an alternative solution where the first item in the mask list is always also the first output item in the list.
However this is not yet to entire solution that I am looking for .
Point is that the Mask list items, can be any number (so for e.g. also {3;3;3}). In you solution only the 3rd item (2in pc language) is compared and ordered.
Thanks again for your solution.
Unfortunately I found out that there is still 1 thing that is not working the way I would like with the tree branch command.
If I have a list which contains a masking rule notation, so for instance a , (meaning there are multiple values). The tree branch only get 1 value. instead of 2. Do know any work around?
This notation is possible using the split tree command, however then I have the same problem (order of output), as my original question. Do you have any suggestions?
See example below;
Example A: (it does work when every list item represents only 1 path)
Example B: (does not work when I use the , in the item (which means there are 2 path in 1 command)