I think you’re missing my point. There’s not really any argument. Connotations are infinite, so whatever you choose is up to you.
It’s more like an opportunity for comparison if any.
But until someone provides some evidence well this meme seems pretty accurate:
jk! 
Mostly what I’m trying to get you to understand is 1:1 has nothing to do with it. It’s not whether you can bend the spoon in one program with one command and bend the spoon in another the same way with the other program.
It’s about one program like SW makes you think it’s a spoon that is being bent, while the other Rhino shows you the actual constituents the spoon is comprised of and the fact it’s not a spoon at all in the first place.
Rhino is a surgical tool that reveals things to the user that the user would never even know were there in the first place with those silly other programs like SW.
Unless of course something changed in the last ten yrs in SW, but I doubt it. It’s probably the same old watered down version of CATIA.
Indeed. There’s certainly possibilities of getting there, but it seems like you’re waiting for something. Another life maybe.
That’s good to know. One less degree of freedom to worry about.
Comparing apples and oranges, while wanting to know what one can do without demonstrating the abilities of the other.
And wanting one to do exactly like the other.
Think of it like this:
‘networksrf’
One of my favorites.
And another would be maybe some sorta sweeps, but that would require the interception of a degree 5 guru of such ideologies.
lofting…
And there’s blending…
just scratching the surface, bbl. 