Mooring bollard

Hello guys! Can any body help me. I am trying to model a mooring bollard and have some problems with top part of it. This is an example of what it looks like:


I made some curves, which determine the shape:
image
First, I tried to use sweep 2 tool. Here is the result:
image
As you can see, it does not keep angle along rails.
Than I tried to use “surface from 2,3,4 edge curves”:
image
The same story as the result. Moreover, that tool has no options at all.
Finaly, I decided to use “surface from network of curves”:
image
Not bad, but I am not satisfied with that big dent. All options in the pop-up menu do not make any changes. Any Ideas? I am new to Rhino, but I am sure there is a way to model such kind of shape. Thank you in advance!

Try sweeping in two sections vertically and then join.

If it doesn’t work, please post a Rhino file.

Followed your advice, but changing rails made it even worse(
image
Here is the Rhino File:
80kNa.3dm (1.3 MB)

Sorry my previous suggestion was missing something. I edited the post.

I think you need surfaces to help with the tangency / curvature

It sort of works. Maybe network surface would lead to a better result…

2 Likes

Nice! Sir, you made my day) I guessed the answer was hidden in that bottom section of settings. I don’t know, how to deal with them, but now it’s the matter of couple of youtube tutorials. I approve your solution, thank you!

1 Like

SubD might also be useful…

2 Likes

Hi @alba95,
Yep, as @martinsiegrist already mentions, this shape screams for SubD.
Of course, it is very friendly that Martin offers a solution with ‘old skool’ Nurbs. But editing the shape will be very cumbersome and not to mention creating a smooth result.
Please find attached a SubD example that shows the power of SubD with this type of shapes, especially as these kind of products are often from a mould and probably forged to give it the proper material specs.

3 Likes

Amazing! I should definitely learn more about subD. Unfortunately, can’t approve two solutions at time, but your work really impressed me! I tried to import your model in Revit, but it went wrong - I got an error. Seems like Revit does not support SubD elements.

1 Like

Running ToNurbs creates a pretty dense object that Revit does struggle with. Depending on your needs, you may do better with a mesh import. Here’s the nurbs and mesh side-by-side in revit. I used to see mesh as a second-class citizen in Revit but since they’ve fixed the graphics for mesh wires they’re much more usable. They’re also extremely lightweight compared to Nurbs objects.

EDIT: as a bonus, now that we can get beautifully structured meshes out of QuadRemesh your coworkers / consultants should have better respect for the workflow


QuadRemesh.3dm (304.5 KB)

2 Likes

Thank you Alexander, for your addition to make a SubD solution functional in Revit.

Subd for this all day.

1 Like

Same for me I just like to challenge myself with nurbs stuff every now and then :rofl:

2 Likes

Well done! As far as I understand, the same type of model I could create in Blender or Max. It’s so pity that Revit does not import those. By the way, what is your Revit version? I have version 21 and I get an error when I try to upload your QuadRemesh file.

I am using 2023 and the Import CAD tool in a Generic Model family.