I have troubles with modelling this footrest pillow.
Two main questions are:
I am adding more precise parametric curves to build a surfaces which attaches to other surface but still receive this crease between them. Surface must flow through those parametric curves on perimeter and inner curves (ISO-curves?).
I am also adding more precise curves to describe corner surface but it is still has folds and creases and not that smooth as I want. Or maybe I am not thinking about correct topology/surfaces assembly.
In NURBS modeling “Less is More”:
less curve means more smoothness the result.
Try to not use inside curve and, picking just the 3 boundaries, choose the “Srf from 2,3,4 edges”.
This tool make a very clean srf but not continuos.
Next, using the Match tools, with MultipleMatch options, you can get the result you are looking for.
Attention: try to put the singularity, where the isocurves converge, on the top part of your model, this would help in getting better result.
I tried to run through your advices and I can’t get better results. I think I didn’t understood you right.
Also, “Srf from 2, 3, 4 edges” gave me vary bad result on the corner.
On the edge surfaces I can’t use this command because the middle curve must describe the surface precisely.
Some visual help would be great
Thank you for reply.
This doesn’t work well because I need yellow curve here to describe the corner.
Doing it your way - this curve and created surface don’t even intersect. So I can’t cut it away.
This is very nice result. But as I see you didn’t use middle curves to describe surfaces which is very important because it changes a shape.
Also exterior corner radius is quite big on your example which probably makes it easier to achieve this nice result.
I am creating a precise model for production. That’s why I should stick to all given curves.
The problem is your curves have too many control points that were not needed. Also, you should keep the same amount of CP counts in both U or V directions.
Thank you, @BrianJ this tutorial is super great.
It definitely solves this problem. Also thank you for showing a problem with tolerance and that funky corner bump.
Is it called “class A surfaces”?
@kevlism, unfortunately I couldn’t reach your link.
But you might be right about control points. But what else can I do if those parametric curves are reached by “Crv from 2 curves” or similar command? If I will rebuild it - it will not be that precise anymore.
@John_Brock, I went through this tutorial and couldn’t complete it in the end because the “_FilletEdge” command returned “Failure in building corners.” while trying to finish 15 mm radiuses.
I am not sure if this tutorial could help me to solve this issue. At least I don’t understand how.