Hello everyone! how are they? I need help, I have been trying for a long time but I do not know how it is done, I have these geometries which later I want to order vertically, skyscraper style, and that its facade will vary openings, such as windows, in the geometry with the largest surface with the largest opening and that later when the surfaces are getting smaller, the openings are getting smaller too,
Basically, the idea is that those spheres that you see there, change with the ones that I loaded in the model, positioning themselves according to the depth of the project, and that’s why I want to see how that can be done on the facade, where the spheres go and its openings Vary the project is deeper
if someone can help me I would really appreciate it, and if you speak Spanish better to be able to explain it better, greetings
Doing this by height isn’t really that big of a deal! You can simply map the radius of the spheres to their z-value or something akin to this. However, what would be the rules for where the spheres appear let’s say at each level?
Lol, instead of admitting you wrote nonsense, you asked an LLM to solve it for you - it’s beyond useless to anybody that will find this thread in the future.
Commenting on a post from 6 years ago with nonsense. Then, when you’re called out on it, you post 800 lines of LLM hallucinations. It isn’t “helping” anyone - it’s amusing that you thought you were. I asked you for a “simple script” so that you’d see that “you can do it by slicing and loft factor” was nonsense and you’d laugh, but you doubled down on what exactly? Not being able to write the script? Real helpful dude… you’ve got three comments on this entire website, none of them useful and you’re calling me a clown? That’s funny.
I believe Ujjwal was trying to be helpful. Could they have been more thoughtful? Sure
But I think your responses have been a little condescending, and frankly mean spirited. It doesn’t help people want to do better, it just makes them not want to participate.
Did you look at the script? There’s no way to go from what Ujjwal told them to the wall of barely formatted C# posted. What are people supposed to learn from that? That you can prompt an LLM to do all your work for you and then you don’t need to learn Grasshopper?
Not sure I’d even call that “participation” - doesn’t seem like a great loss.
You might see it as mean spirited, but if a beginner asks that question and you say “Oh just do a loft factor” - what does that even mean Nick? Is it “helpful”?
Well next time if might be more constructive to lead by telling them exactly this, instead of laughing, accusing them of nonsense, and labeling their contribution as useless.
Look at CJ’s reply - it’s great, it’s not advanced, it doesn’t solve much, but you can read it, you can understand it and it gives you a place to start - the walls of C# do none of that
Why do you assume its not useful? I would have loved to look at the wall of C#… now its deleted probably because you said it was not useful to anybody…
But most importantly, the irony is that it longer matters if one can read C# or not, you don’t need to. You can copy what Ujjwal posted, paste it in a chatbot and tell it to explain it to you or help you recreate that logic with grasshopper components.
“the irony is that it longer matters if one can read C# or not, you don’t need to. You can copy what Ujjwal posted, paste it in a chatbot and tell it to explain it to you” - I really wish you could see how funny this is - tell me more about “limited imagination” while you ask AI to read to you (maybe it could even explain to you what “irony” means)
(maybe it could even explain to you what “irony” means)
