Hi japhy,
I looked into (wish for v9 save gh data inside the rhino 3dm file) and I’m totally against that, the only use case for this is when you send files to another use you would want to include the grasshopper scripts, how is this different than putting the gh files and 3dm file into a zip folder? also organization will basically be impossible.
I looked into rhino inside tekla, and I think (for now) this is exactly what we want, I’m in love with the idea
If your argument is “you can do that in with rhino inside tekla why would we make the same thing in rhino”, in my perspective there many advantages, rhino and grasshopper being such flexible platforms, in no time we will see creatives and technicians do stuff with this system that is only possible with this system, also, once that system is implemented and maybe few ideas from other users and further improvements, maybe something really great will come alive that will completely change how we design
thank you for your time and considerations
best regards