Wishlist: Improvement of Perspective Match

Please McNeel can you improve this tool. Maybe like https://fspy.io/
Because the current tool does not really provide an up-to-date visual feedback.

Hi -

I’ve added this thread to the open feature request RH-20575 PerspectiveMatch improvements needed
-wim

Nice Thanks! :+1:

the comments in the log say “few are vocal about this” so I’m adding my voice to be a part of that few that would like to see an improvement in perspective match.

I’ve just tried matching a model to a photograph and the tool didn’t work–after calling out 6 points–likely because the size of my model isn’t the same as the size of the matching photograph?

I think having the user define various planes/lines in the photograph (as other users have shown in other threads) would be more efficient and beneficial.

Thanks!

Added…
-w

This feature if working correctly for my work would move me to upgrade to R8.

Anything new for Perspective match in 2026 ?

I don’t get it, I place 4pts, and then nothing happen, even if I press enter.

After 6pts, I get the “press enter when done” option. I further get a prompt : do you want to place other points? Whether I say yes or no nothing happen

Also, Is it normal that I need to place more then 4 pts ?

Am I missing something?

Thanks

CC

Hi Charles -

In a quick test here, something happens after matching 4 points.
Please post both the output from the Rhino SystemInfo command and the 3dm file that you are having problems with.
-wim

@wim, as my question was more of a worflow strategy, I moved it to another topic :

---- EDIT

I finally create an PerspectiveMatch tool integration (fSpy).
WorksWell and really accurate