What can McNeel do to improve your development?


(Dale Fugier) #10

According to the following page, you need to order at least 2 copies…

http://www.rhino3d.com/reseller/napa

But you could contact the appropriate person (on the Reseller) page for all the details.


(Dale Fugier) #11

Thanks for the feedback, John. It would like you need additional features in our toolkits.

You can store any kind of geometry on a CRhinoHistory object, including light extrusion objects. So I might need more information on this.

Is this related to history and extrusion? Please clarify.

I’m going to need some help on what you are looking for and why.

Thanks!

– Dale


#12

I have seen the “Missing

documentation” text a couple of times on RhinoCommon SDK pages.

Other than that would it be possible to add some sort of navigation, the way RhinoCommon SDK has (the one with drop down menus on the left), to wiki.mcneel pages? Sometimes I get surprise what can be found on wiki.mcneel, without me being able to find that page from on /wiki.mcneel.com/developer/home page.

Steve already explained to me, there will be no release for Win XP, still I just felt like saying it nevertheless:
I am not able to use the current Rhino Script compiler due to limitations of my operating system - it does not support .NET 4.5.


(Dale Fugier) #13

Do you have an example of this?

So, having “RhinoCommon” on the sidebar would be helpful? How about just bookmarking the RhinoCommon home page?

Not much we can do about .NET 4.5 not working on 13-year old Windows XP - sorry.


#14

[quote=“dale, post:13, topic:10491”]
Do you have an example of this?[/quote]

Out of my mind, I remember of GetCameraExtents method.
There are more of these.

I have just noticed the Sitemap. That’s the navigation I was talking about. Sorry.
Just a small addition, looks like “Grasshopper” has been missing from the menu on the left.

[quote=“dale, post:13, topic:10491”]
Not much we can do about .NET 4.5 not working on 13-year old Windows XP - sorry.[/quote]

Looks like it is possible to make one for .NET 4 (Win XP supports .NET 4), but Steve simply can’t make it, with all the work he has at Mcneel.


#15

I’ll second “completing the RhinoCommon SDK documentation”, although I don’t have any specific examples of missing documentation that’s annoyed me off the top of my head. (I know it’s happened, though.) More sophistication in the toolbar installation process would be great, and I’d still love for RhinoDoc.EndSaveDocument to work the way it seems like it should.


(Menno Deij - van Rijswijk) #16

Another thing that would be very nice is if custom grips would actually work in RhinoCommon.


#17

I like to develop script via rscript or rpython but for me would be great if Mcneel could organize courses on how to use rhinocommon maybe with C#…


#18

Please add proper IntelliSense to the Python editor. :rocket:

c.


(Luis Fraguada) #19

Hello Dale,
First I want to say that for the most part it is a pleasure to develop for Rhino! I’ve learned a lot with the examples you provide in the wiki and the Rhinocommon SDK is quite useful.
I would also like to see the SDK documentation completed as there are missing descriptions all over the place. Also, adding code examples as you have in the Rhinoscript help would be great. I know there are some in there, but would be great for this to exist in all documented elements.

(to pick out a few random ones…obviously they are almost self explanatory, but would be nice to just have the short description and usage sample).
http://4.rhino3d.com/5/rhinocommon/?topic=html/M_Rhino_Display_RhinoViewport_ClientToScreen_1.htm
http://4.rhino3d.com/5/rhinocommon/?topic=html/T_Rhino_DocObjects_HatchPattern.htm

I also noticed that the Event Model is pretty loose. For example, EndOpenDocument fires several times as the document is opening. Should this not fire once when the document is actually opened and finished loading any resources? I eventually got around the issue waiting for Rhino to become Idle, but I wonder if the EndOpenDocument event should be fired so many times for a reason?

Finally, I would like to request some information on licensing and the best practices, or options out there for plugin licensing. I know that this has implications beyond Rhino, but as tied to Rhino, it would be good to know what our options are (for those of us who have never touched upon the subject). What are the devices that facilitate licensing (Zoo vs license key vs license server?).

All the best,
Luis


Plug-in licensing and best practices
EndOpenDocument called multiple times
(Dale Fugier) #20

The Rhino.Python editor has “IntelliSense.” What is “proper” IntelliSense?


(Dale Fugier) #21

We completely agree with everyone’s request for new/better/improved/complete documentation. We hope to address this in the future.

I going to create a new thread for this…


(Steve Baer) #22

This is pretty hard to get correct since python is not a strongly typed language. That being said, I think we can improve on what we currently support. @alain, can you look into improving this for V6?


(Dale Fugier) #23

If we had better “getting started” documentation, would this help? Would you still need a course?


#24

Hi @dale, @stevebaer and @Alain,

what i´ve meant is that we get code completion for RhinoCommon methods like below eg.:

import Rhino

def SomeFunction():
    pt = Rhino.Geometry.Point3d(0,0,0)
    pt. # does not bring up anything

I know this is a lot to ask for but it would be extremely valuable for the Python editor.

c.


#25

+1


#26

RhinoCommon has come a long way since the old SDK, and its fantastic. But I agree with @fraguada about completing the SDK documentation,

I also agree with @menno about creating two types of documentation, one for entry level, and one for advanced topics, in multiple languages (C#, .Net, Python, etc). Having it consolidated in one location will make it easy to search for solutions. I travel frequently and it would be nice for users to have the ability to download offline documentation as well.

All in all, great work!!


(Alain Cormier) #27

Yes, that’s definitely something I’m looking into.


#28

Hi @Dale,
a starting kit it’s a good thing but, because the language, I would prefer a proper course taken in person with real teacher. Maybe because I am a teacher…
I think with a teacher you could get more information, more “shade”.
I started the rpython 101 and never taken the end. I’m still missing lot of concept also if I read it more than 5 time. (maybe I need just an English course!?!?)

Ps: just asked to Steve how to organize a course in Italy :wink:


(Steve Baer) #29

This is something that @piac can help you with. Giulio provides courses or can put you in contact with someone else if he is not available.