I am trying to sweep two merged sections across these eliptical shapes and its not return a smooth sweep.
homework 3.gh (87.0 KB)
I am trying to sweep two merged sections across these eliptical shapes and its not return a smooth sweep.
Hi, @Zarif_Abrar!
WellâŠIâll mention not all your sweep sections intersect your rails ![]()
And that youâll most likely continue to have questions about sweep for the rest of your modeling career.
Also, rule of thumb: never upload your entire grasshopper definition, as you did (unless itâs short and sweet); only upload the internalized stuff you need help with. Sorry, but I do appreciate you grouped the âproblem areaâ, though, that helped!
In the meantime, notify if this* helps:
homework 3.gh (91.5 KB)
*As workaround, Iâve âforcedâ your elliptical rails to make contact with your sections, plus a tweak to accommodate for Sweep2 instead.
Cheers,
RC
is there any way to make it conform more to my previous rails? because this solution creates a large offset from the original ellipsis that I was trying to sweep across
I believe so, one way* below, with bad results ![]()
homework 3-conform-lines.gh (95.7 KB)
*âSnappingâ your non-touching sections (line pairs) to their corresponding rails (ellipses) isnât a big hassle, the problem is that Sweep1 is still grasshopper sweep, and it does whatever it wants!
Also, my ignorance impedes a better explanation, I apologize. However, I can tell you that the errors in the grasshopper sweep result do not occur when I bake the âconformedâ lines and perform the sweep manually in Rhino. In fact, the sweep that got skipped (bottom) does work without a problem manually. This just leaves us with more questions ![]()
Hopefully someone with higher skill or troubleshooting knowledge can assist! Or maybe weâll think of a workaround overnight.
Best,
RC
plus my memory, I should add ![]()
The sweep works when done manually in rhino but as a half, you must tell it itâs a closed sweep while the command is active. We donât have this mid-step in GH.
[quote=âRenĂ© Corella, post:4, topic:216000, username:RenĂ©_Corellaâ]
Or maybe weâll think of a workaround overnight.
[/quote]
But, perhaps the next thing is to start with half sweeps ![]()