Thanks a lot Pascal. Not impossible to send but lots of linked blocks that I’d need to strip down a bit first.
For a bit more detail:
- I have a file where block “part A” is distributed 78 times as instances. Inside part A is a nested block called “part A_0”, which occurs twice inside part A.
- In another file, I have a definition called part B, but it still nests two instances of Part A_0.
- I then created a file in which I have both part A and part B, different definitions as linked blocks, but both nesting the same Part A_0, which albeit the same geometry, still belongs to different parent blocks.
Maybe is this impossible for the “Do this for all conflicts” checkbox? It seems to auto-rename parent blocks that are identical just fine, but perhaps not with nested blocks inside them?
Thanks for your thoughts.