I’d like to match two ends of a surface with history on, which doesn’t work. Is that more of a bug or an insurmountable limitation of how the history works?
1 Like
Yep, I know… This has always been, in my understanding, a ‘limitation’ but for all the times I’ve asked about it, I do not, right now, see a bugtrack item for it. If I cannot find one I’ll make one.
-Pascal
@pascal
any updates on this topic ?
mac os 13.5.1
Version 8 (8.9.24163.15302, 2024-06-11)
it even seams, that a second call to _matchSrf breaks history without a history warning.
in the very simple case below:
do a 1st _matchSrf at (1)
do a 2nd _matchSrf at (2) … will break the _matchSrf history at (1) without any warning.
this seams more then a limitation…
Hi Tom - this does work if you use the MultipleMatches option - i.e. one MatchSrf operation but two edges matched.
MultipleMatches_History.3dm (83.0 KB)
-Pascal
thanks for having a look at it…
yes - but multiple matches will have the same parameters for all edges.
… but if I have a more complex matching case - where I would love to have a combination of G1, G2, and maybe different option / parameters for the tolerance or the isocurve style - it will fail.
… and still the second matchSrf will distroy the history from the first - without a warning
kind regards -tom