Hi,
Thanks for reply…
Thats my mistake on that last radius…, plans indicated the last but one and I thought I needed one at leading edge so went for the same rad…oops !
Now I know what that rad should be.
That aside, how should these surfaces overseen by Pascal have been joined to facilitate such edge commands and other actions later on ?
The surface labelled by you as should be a planar surface was a surface created by tool surface from 2 or more curves, the curves were dupedge created from the surfaces you see cut through with a PLANAR surface formed from an extruded line.
if one cuts a surface such as this with a planar surface, why doesnt a planar surface result when dupedge and surface from 2 or more curves is used ?
Should I have used surface from planar curves tool ? I guess I grabbed the wrong tool, didnt spot the other one in the hurry.
So presented with planar curves, tool surface from 23or4 curves can create a non planar surface, i.e, cock things up a bit !
so it would seem. The dupedge it was given to use was festooned with points, lessened with FitCrv. They resulted from a simple straight cut across that networkSrf.
Break in surface continuity is where networkSrf result meets sweep2rail result. Both were run past Pascal and the forum as what is best approach. The NetworkSrf area looked super, the sweep2 and use of point looked ok…ish. I would like to know how they could be better produced at wingtips.
Cheers
Steve