Maybe there is a bug in the calculation of beam utlization for buckling?
I tried to prove the results from the utilization component for a simply supported beam with a transverse uniform load. However, the utilization seems to depend on gammaM0 and not gammaM1 as seen in the pictures below. This is not what I would expect for buckling, in this case, assuming it is LT buckling, equation 6.55 in Eurocode 3.
Does buckling depend on gammaM0 in Karamba?
beamBuckling.gh (33.2 KB)