IsoCurve bug.gh (19.3 KB)
I got the surface from this post.
Might related:
[Bug?] Trimmed surface’s Isocurves missing at the seam position - Grasshopper - McNeel Forum
IsoCurve bug.gh (19.3 KB)
I got the surface from this post.
Might related:
[Bug?] Trimmed surface’s Isocurves missing at the seam position - Grasshopper - McNeel Forum
Not the same thing, extract iso curve seems a bug but there are some extrapolation possible on surface
SAME BUG.gh (33.1 KB)
I guess this is the similar bug solved before. It’s like zombie come back alive and never die…
Iso Curve, like Iso Trim only works on the untrimmed surfaces. Right now the bug you are seing is that Iso Curve is including the {0,0} V curve because it is not being registered as “within” the domain between the untrimmed surface edge and trimmed surface. You can see all the other V curves being excluded from the empty branches:
The “extra” lines are the U curves, one for each UV coordinate. The only way to fix this is to rebuild as an untrimmed surface.
Sorry, I showed the wrong reference. I think it got fixed, but now it returns.
Hi @Quan_Li,
You are tight is a bug on the Iso Curve component.
Thanks for reporting.
RH-86991 is fixed in Rhino 8 Service Release 31
Thank you very much!