Yes. I wrote about this 2 years ago:
It’s obvious at this point this is absolutely unimportant to McNeel. I gave up even reporting how broken BoxEdit is on and off. My only comment was last week about a feature request: working with any selectable SubOjbect. But what’s the point do adding features to a room that continues to be broken?
No need to apologize for that Steve. Running into bugs here and there is normal. Shipping us untested software so you offload to our businesses the work that should be handled by your business is what frustrates me.
It’s always super exciting to hear about all this future stuff like compute, and new architectures, and all that fancy stuff. But any hour of your teams’ work that’s going into that, prioritized over going into shipping software with a basic level of polish and functionally for those of us who have to work with your software, is really bad prioritization IMO.
Best,
Gustavo