Can we have better surface visualization like cybertrak and icem surf?
To be more helpful you should give more context and a deeper explanation of what you need and what’s the problem it should be addressed.
Throwing a sentence like this doesn’t help anyone.
This old treadh gives a good advice on How to ask efficient question
Wants developers to spend weeks implementing a few feature, can’t be bothered to write more than a single sentence.
I’m not familiar with the software mentioned so I’ve got no idea what they’re even talking about. No pictures, no video…nothing.
Do you mean cyberstrak ? Or what?
Perhaps you can try some custom display modes from this topic and see if they will do the job for you.
I often use “Light lines 5 Plus”, which is posted here:
Here is a list of my favorite display modes:
For a better visualisation, you can change your surfaces’ render meshes to a much higher density, and use a specific display mode, as @Rhino_Bulgaria mentions above. You can have the same visualisation quality like in Alias or ICEM.
Here is an example of the “Light lines 5 Plus” display mode. It’s far better at detecting surface imperfections than the default Zebra analysis. Models that may appear good with the Zebra suddenly look bad with this particular display mode. That’s because the coloured stripes reveal curvature irregularities better than the black and white zebra stripes.
That looks great, but I do wonder why a display mode like that isn’t one of the defaults in Rhino?
I generally use a custom display mode based upon Shaded that gets rid of tangent lines.