Sub-level relative elevation vs absolute bug

I think it has been mentioned before, with all the other feature-requests regarding sub-levels.

When selecting a level, a sub-level belongs to that level. When grabbing the measure tool to set the elevation, clicking on the model results instead of setting the elevation as: level_elevation + (or -) the measurement, it sets the elevation to the measured height, and setting a + or -, depending on wether it’s higher or lower than the parent level. And it’s placed according its value higher or lower. So it’s weird, it’s taking the absolute elevation, with a + or - in front, and it’s relative to a level, placed higher than other levels or sublevels that actually have larger absolute elevation.

The expected would be clicking in the model, setting the elevation to level_elevation ± the measurement.
Of course the above would be solved with absolute and relative field.

Please try to reproduce it, and you will understand, if the above does not make sense.

Hi @GabrielB I agree. The way the “measure” tool works with sub-levels doesn’t make sense now. We will revise this.