# Request for Osnap EXTRAs to be in two columns like the primary

**URL:** <https://discourse.mcneel.com/t/request-for-osnap-extras-to-be-in-two-columns-like-the-primary/224279>\
**Category:** Serengeti (Rhino BETA)\
**Tags:** windows\
**Created:** [November 4, 2026, 3:32pm UTC](https://discourse.mcneel.com/t/request-for-osnap-extras-to-be-in-two-columns-like-the-primary/224279 "2026-11-04T15:32:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TimElkaer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/mcneel/user_avatar/discourse.mcneel.com/timelkaer/32/771308_2.png) [@TimElkaer](https://discourse.mcneel.com/u/TimElkaer)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2026, 3:32pm UTC](https://discourse.mcneel.com/t/request-for-osnap-extras-to-be-in-two-columns-like-the-primary/224279/1 "2026-11-04T15:32:33Z")

</div>

Request for Osnap secondary EXTRAs to be put in 2 columns like the primary Osnap.  
When you have large buttons in the left Sidebar in 4 columns (to stick to the new logical setup where many things are in pairs) you will automatically get the Onsnaps in two columns with icon and text, but the secondary Osnaps (EXTRA) with Shift and Ctrl will still display in on column and therefore the Osnap Container takes up to much space IMO.

Sorry for the poor soundquality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trav](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/mcneel/user_avatar/discourse.mcneel.com/trav/32/681734_2.png) [@Trav](https://discourse.mcneel.com/u/Trav)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2026, 10:29pm UTC](https://discourse.mcneel.com/t/request-for-osnap-extras-to-be-in-two-columns-like-the-primary/224279/2 "2026-11-04T22:29:07Z")

</div>

The issue that’s happening is the text length values of the shift states are much longer and the layout for them requires wider buttons which forces the layout to a single column. Example “PerpFrom” is pushing the layout requirement in your example. I’ve played with abbreviated versions but localization might still mess that strategy up as well. Icon only mode can solve this currently. Have you tried that layout?