Hi to all,
I’ve got a scripting problem (RhinoPython) where I simply hope that you can help. In a script I would like to check 2 surfaces if they are geometrically the same. They are the same if the’ve got the same naked edges (boundary) as well as there is no significant surface deviation. In progamming the last criterion the command _PointDeviation can be used. srf1 and srf2 are guids of the surfaces; srf1 is the reference surface (named RefSurface) and srf2 is the one to be checked (it was a copy of srf1, just the upper right corner – control points – have been slightly moved in y direction in the accompanying Rhino-file rhino1.3dm).
To execute the _PointDeviation command the control string is built up:
str = ‘!-_PointDeviation Visible None _SelID ’ + srf1 + ’ _Enter’ +
’ _SelID ’ + sfr2 + ’ _Enter _Enter’
rs.command(str)
A test macro is stored in rhino1.3dm under File>Remarks.
It works so far, but how can I adjust the goodPoint-, badPoint-, and Ignore-option before testing?
How can the statistics reported in the pop-up panel (in my case just the maximum distance is needed) be analysed by RhinoPython script?
Additionally, how can I make the command _PointDeviation working more fine/coarse-grained (more/less test points)?
And finally, I cannot use the English words like Visible and also not _Visible, instead I have to use the German one Sichtbar.
It would be fine if you could help me … thanks.
Best regards,
Björn Reder
rhino1.3dm (105.7 KB)