Imported surfaces vs. Rhino build nurbs
I am experimenting with panelling methods in grasshopper and I noticed this issue with imported surfaces from other softwares (in my case Autodesk Alias).
If I import surfaces from Alias into Rhino and plug the surface into my grasshopper definition the distribution of the elements is uneven and is highly depending on the distribution of the CV’s and spans of the surface. (even with reparameterization in Grasshopper)
On the other hand, If I duplicate the edges of the imported surface, rebuild them and build the same surface again with the new curves made in Rhino the panelling works just fine.
Does anyone have an idea why that is? Could there be a way to avoid the rebuilding?
Thanks in advance.panel_test_01.gh (27.4 KB)