In the new and long-awaited version of Rhino will be a solution of the offset of a cylinder?
Or it is an inherent limitation of many CAD modelers?
Thanks.
what do you mean exactly?
cylinders offset ok.
(but then again, i probably don’t know what you mean)
I mean that the top of the cylinder, after an offset, is not executed.
Nothing serious, but I wanted to understand whether this exercise will be resolved or not.
Thank You
Excuse me, little mistake, I wanted a “cone”, not a cylinder. 
I did a little confusion with another example … sorry for the mistake.
haha. i see now.
how do you expect it to look? to a point or as it is now except the top is capped?
from a user point_of_view, i imagine most people would expect it to go to a point, right?
with a bit of scripting you could also use scale for a cone 
and get the same result but with top 
Interesting, the current result rhino gives (opened tip, not capped) is inclomplete but would be wrong even when capped.
I guess to get a closed cone (no cap but spike) offsetting the curve of revolution, then fix and revolve the offset curve would be the easiest way to do it.
c.