Attached is a file of a Sweep1 shape. What are the crosses showing just off the corners? They go away when I turn off isocurves, but what do they represent exactly?
Thanks,
Dennis
baseboard.3dm (620.9 KB)
Those be some completely wacky surfacesā¦ Explode your object to isolate them.
How did you make that? I cannot reproduce the problem when using the inside āUā as a rail, I do get some weirdness when I use the outside āUā, but not the same as yoursā¦
I got the same wacky surfaces here with the inside rail. Iāll YT thatā¦
https://mcneel.myjetbrains.com/youtrack/issue/RH-54138
-wim
Hmm, wonder why I didnāt get them hereā¦
baseboard-msh.3dm (639.3 KB)
That is weird, yes. I get those wacky surfaces with your input as well. (6.18.19216.18471, 08/04/2019)
-wim
OK, Iām still on 6.17ā¦
But that shouldnāt be it - If the audit command is correct, Dennis is on 6.16:
Interface Name: Rhinoceros 6.16 - Commercial, build 2019-07-09 - (compiled Jul 9 2019)
@wim, @dmoyes, @Helvetosaur - I get the right answer if I true up the shape curve - make sure it is planar and the vertical leg is exactly over the path. It is not off by much, and I have not found where itās off.
Itās the vertical leg of the shape curve- the ends are microscopically not on a vertical line.
-Pascal
Thanks for that. Iāll get out my microscope! Does it have anything to do with the tolerance settings?
Hello - I donāt think so - tolerances are quite tight in this file. Just fyi, fixing is a matter of selecting the vertical leg points and using SetPt in XY only, to set them to the end of the path curve (I used the inner āUā)
-Pascal
Understood. Thanks Pascal.
Thanks, @pascal. When I filed the YT report I tried to simplify the profile curve as much as possible. If it was reduced to only that inside vertical line, all went well. With the added fillet curve at the top, it failed.
-wim
hm - interesting as wellā¦ I wonder whatās is up with that - anyway, I guess Lowellās on itā¦
-Pascal
1 Like