Kangaroo Load test

Grasshopper Kangaroo
,
1

Hi all,

I have two questions regarding the example shown in the image below: the “Anchor” configuration for the central area and the “Load” settings for the peripheral area.

image
image450×427 45.7 KB

Question1:

I am using “Collision One|Many” for the Anchor & Load settings; is there any other way to make the selection?

Question2:

I simply adjusted the TriRemesh length from 10mm to 3mm, yet the calculation results changed. The result with the 10mm length better suits my needs; however, I have a complex model that requires a finer mesh for the calculation. Which parameters should I adjust?

image
image823×421 84.8 KB

Best Regards,

COCO

Load_test_0630.gh (49.1 KB)

2

Hello . For your first question , yes , there is a better way . You can use Point in Brep component and you can see how much it’s faster than Collision One|Many :

image
image1012×422 62.4 KB

3

And another tip , if you are using Bouncy Solver , the Entwine part for goals won’t affect the final data structure and the Solver output is flattened . You rather using Solver for that part .

4

image
image1628×553 102 KB

For part 2 , I added the Feature parameter of the TriRemesh component . therefore the mesh result is much finer .
But still , in your script , the solver never converges , which is not satisfying …
image
image494×451 87.5 KB

5

Thank you for your hlep

6

Thank you for your help