I am always impressed by how Rhino’s command search adapts over time and brings to the top the commands you use often, so after a while you only have to type a few letters usually and get the command you want.
That would be so good to have in GH as well. I would say that even as a pro GH user you still only use about 10% of the nodes 90% of the time. Yet some commands you use constantly like “list item” are particularly annoying. Often times you need to basically write down the whole command, even though you use it all the time.
Searching for “list item”. Typing “lis” so far so good:
When you get to “list” there are actually LESS options that start with “list” then before and list item actually disappears from the list:
Then you add the i and type “list i” and now list item reappears although it should clearly be the “best” match:
All of a sudden as you think the search should get MORE specific, it actually seems to get LESS specific.
Construct Domain is another good example. Its the “construct …” node I use by far the much, yet when I type it I get 12 options I never use.
Lastly the search algorithm just doesn’t seem to be working in a way that I find logical. I know a lot of algorithms dont work as our human logic would assume, but there has to be a better search algorithm.
So I would really like it if a) GH can remember what commands we use often and give them a higher weight the same way Rhino does and b) GH uses a search algorithm which aligns a bit more with how we expect to find things.