EdgeContinuity Issues

Yeah - at least that is what the complaint seems to be - the expectation is that if the numbers are small it ought to be smooth, which I understand… but I am not sure how that information would/should be presented within this tool.

-Pascal

The issue from the user perspective is that EdgeContinuity is saying things are G2 that are not even remotely G2. In this instance we have a really exaggerated example that is clear to the naked eye, but this will not always be the case, and so it’s hard to see how EdgeContinuity ends up being a valid check of G2, especially as models get bigger and more complicated. It’s good for G1, but not for G2.

1 Like

It seems like an error to me. I guess it should report the total difference of the signed curvature vectors.

2 Likes

@lowell - should I make a YT item for this, or did you already?
Looks like not, I’ll make one.
RH-64670 EdgeContinuity: G2 report tune-up

Thanks y’all.
-Pascal

6 Likes