Creating a point class derived from GeometryBase?

[ivelin.peychev]

@stevebaer,

Is it possible to override the Group class somehow, like another workaround to the behavior I wish to achieve?

e.g. instead of creating custom brep_type to create custom group_type. Groups don’t get exploded, right?

I’ll have to be extra careful maintaining water-tightness of the custom_objects.

If I create a class derived both from brep and group. Can I prevent explode?

Update:

@ivelin.peychev

Groups don’t get exploded, right?

Pffff. Groups can’t but the objects inside can.

Update (2):
This comment by @DavidRutten,

@DavidRutten

In the Rhino SDK we have to strike a balance between giving people the tools they need, but also making sure that no plugin developer can cause serious problems for everyone else by giving them access to sensitive instances. The solution we chose is to bottleneck all interaction with the Rhino document, so we always know when and how something changes.

Made me think of another probable solution, which seem a bit more complex and but anyways I’ll ask.

Is it possible to create an extension of Rhino3dmIO (Rhino3dm) so that I can create custom objects there using not RhinoCommon but a custom API that derives from RhinoCommon?

Or I don’t know what I’m talking about